I am surprised to found out that, according to 'normal' developmental milestone, a kid is expected to be able to draw a square by the age of 3.5 and a triangle by the age of 5.
I always thought the other way round. Because, you see, a square have more lines and angles as compared to that of a triangle.
So, using this logic, it is more complex to draw a square than a triangle, hence triangle before square, supposedly.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOB8BJD6AyFFJO6tL_NG5wbYEzjBnGZbnDKe2D2r0N8upab1OSoZmmCqFxA3ugfMLZYwuImdT6Lm7mitc4wakBpP0lfXpGxzl_svBOXLRp4qCAehe6GJbq-f05Wt-Mn-m-Q_hq/s320/triangle1.gif)
So, using this logic, it is more complex to draw a square than a triangle, hence triangle before square, supposedly.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhQ705JKX7DmwXVmFuoHZO75jbMvtj3N_0F_o91DKmdP-A3BxiTpM3HiarPaDBA5kTreNWdxu5PR_sELT-sxLqJtZeinIOg7Kc2LeVhQyH-ptceaMijfdKPFT8_XvX3rEKrTMq7/s320/square.jpg)
Subhanallah, I am perplexed.
No comments:
Post a Comment